Rl. Atmar et al., COMPARISON OF REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION PCR WITH TISSUE-CULTURE AND OTHERRAPID DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF TYPE-A INFLUENZA-VIRUS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(10), 1996, pp. 2604-2606
We applied a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay for influenza A viru
s to combined nasal wash-throat swab specimens previously obtained fro
m an outpatient pediatric population with acute respiratory illness du
ring concurrent epidemics of influenza A virus and respiratory syncyti
al virus, The results of the RT-PCR assay were compared with those pre
viously reported with virus cultivation and commercially available rap
id diagnostic kits (E. A. Dominguez, L. H. Taber, and R. B. Couch, J.
Clin, Microbiol. 31:2286-2290, 1993). With virus cultivation as the ''
gold standard,'' the RT-PCR assay had a sensitivity, specificity, and
efficiency of 95, 98, and 97%, respectively, compared with 75, 100, an
d 93%, respectively, for the best diagnostic kit (Becton Dickinson Dir
ectigen). RT-PCR is an effective alternative to virus isolation for th
e detection of influenza A virus in clinical specimens.