N. Weinzweig et al., REPLANTATION AND REVASCULARIZATION AT THE TRANSMETACARPAL LEVEL - LONG-TERM FUNCTIONAL RESULTS, The Journal of hand surgery, 21A(5), 1996, pp. 877-883
Thirteen consecutive transmetacarpal replantations and revascularizati
ons in 12 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Ten patients (11 han
ds) sustained crush injuries, 1 withstood an explosive blast, and 1 su
ffered a guillotine amputation. Nine revascularizations (1 thumb and 3
1 fingers) and 4 replantations (1 thumb and 16 fingers), including bil
ateral procedures in 1 patient, were performed. Forty-four of 49 repla
ntable digits (90%) were salvaged. Ten patients (11 hands) required se
condary surgery (mean, 4.5 procedures per hand), 29 of 49 (60%) for te
ndon and joint scarring and 7 of 20 (14%) for nonunions or malunions.
Range of motion averaged 109 degrees per digit. intrinsic muscle funct
ion and pinch and grip strengths were weak or absent. Recovery of sens
ibility was poor. According to Chen et al.'s grading system of functio
nal return, 4 (31%) were grade 11, 4 (31%) were grade III, and 5 (38%)
grade IV. The follow-up period ranged from 2.5 to 11 years. Only 1 pa
tient resumed his prior occupation (as supervisor); 2 were permanently
disabled, 3 pursued new and unrelated occupations, 2 were still in th
erapy, and 4 were lost to late follow-up evaluation. None of the manua
l laborers (11 patients) were able to return to their preinjury liveli
hood. Despite these discouragingly poor results, all patients were sat
isfied with the surgery.