In our department of neuropediatrics we made a definite diagnosis of c
ongenital hemiparesis in a total of 123 patients born between 1974 and
1985. This diagnosis was always made or confirmed at a point after th
e patient's first birthday. Recently, we were able to follow up on 102
of them (83%) to determine whether their symptoms persist, that is, i
f the initial diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) was correct or not. Now
, at the age of 9 to 18 years, 94 of these 102 patients (92%) still su
ffer from hemiparesis. We were able to perform MRI on 44 of them. A le
sion consistent with the neurological symptoms was found in 43. Only o
ne patient had normal findings-a false negative, so to speak. Of the 1
02 patients, eight (8%) had no hemiparesis, i.e. no disability at all
at the time of the follow-up. All eight had in common the fact that th
e former functional involvement had been slight and not arm-dominated.
Seven of them were also examined with MRI. Six had normal findings; M
RI revealed a periventricular lesion consistent with the earlier hemip
aretic symptoms in only one patient (a false positive, so to speak). W
e conclude that some children ''outgrow'' a hemiparetic cerebral palsy
, even in later childhood years. In our patient group this happened be
tween the ages of 3 and 10. We further propose that MRT could be usefu
l in distinguishing between transitory and persistent hemiparesis.