Predictivism asserts that where evidence E confirms theory T, E provid
es stronger support for T when E is predicted on the basis of T and th
en confirmed than when E is known before T's construction and 'used',
in some sense, in the construction of T. Among the most interesting at
tempts to argue that predictivism is a true thesis (under certain cond
itions) is that of Patrick Maher (1988, 1990, 1993). The purpose of th
is paper is to investigate the nature of predictivism using Maher's an
alysis as a starting point. I briefly summarize Maher's primary argume
nt and expand upon it; I explore related issues pertaining to the caus
al structure of empirical domains and the logic of discovery.