Sd. Evans et al., EFFECT OF SUBSOILING AND SUBSEQUENT TILLAGE ON SOIL BULK-DENSITY, SOIL-MOISTURE, AND CORN YIELD, Soil & tillage research, 38(1-2), 1996, pp. 35-46
Many producers use subsoilers periodically to alleviate suspected comp
action caused by traffic from tillage, planting, and harvesting equipm
ent, In the fall of 1988 a study was initiated in the upper Midwest re
gion of the USA near Morris, Minnesota to study the effects of a one-t
ime subsoiling and its interaction with four subsequent primary tillag
e systems (fall moldboard plowing, fall chisel plowing, spring disking
, and no-tilling) on soil compaction, soil moisture, penetrometer resi
stance, and corn (Zea mays L,) growth and grain yield, The experiment
was established on a Hamerly clay loam (Aeric Calciaquoll)-Aastad clay
loam (Pzchic Udic Haploboroll) complex, Subsoiling was performed in t
he fall of 1988 and the study was cropped to continuous corn from 1989
to 1991 on a site that had been farmed many years by normal 6-row, 76
-cm row width equipment, Results show that subsoiling had very little
effect on plant growth and no effect on grain yield over three croppin
g seasons following the subsoiling operation, Subsoiling had significa
nt effects on soil bulk density and volumetric soil moisture content i
n 1989, but by 1990-1991 these effects were not significant. Volumetri
c soil moisture content generally increased in relation to soil bulk d
ensity increases. Tillage impacted surface residue accumulation, but d
id not affect soil bulk density, volumetric soil moisture, or grain yi
eld, Results from this study indicate that subsoiling soils does not n
ecessarily result in better yields or better soil moisture availabilit
y, particularly if compaction problem are not evident.