CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SCHIZOPHYLLAN (SPG) IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA

Citation
G. Mantovani et al., CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SCHIZOPHYLLAN (SPG) IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA, International journal of oncology, 10(1), 1997, pp. 213-221
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
10196439
Volume
10
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
213 - 221
Database
ISI
SICI code
1019-6439(1997)10:1<213:CAIEOS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
A phase II randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of Schizophyllan (SPG) used in com bination with standard chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in pati ents with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Seve ral immunological parameters were considered to assess the immunoregul atory activity of SPG in the: same patients. The clinical and immunolo gical evaluations were performed both before and at the end of the stu dy (4 months later). All patients received standard chemotherapy for h ead and neck squamous cell carcinoma according to one of the following treatment regimens: 1) cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 1,000 m g/m(2) i.v. continuous infusion days 1 to 5; 2) cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i .v, day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) i.v. over 4 h days 2 to 5, vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 2 and 8. Antineoplastic regimens were repeated every 28 days x 4 cycles for approximately 4 months. SPG was administered w eekly at a single dose of 40 mg intramuscularly for 4 months in additi on to standard chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 22 of whom were evaluable. Thirteen patients were assigned to A rm A (treatment with SPG associated with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2) and 9 patients to Arm B (treatment with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2, alone). The overall response rate was not significantly different bet ween the two Arms (92.3% in Arm A vs. 100% in Arm B), although a highe r number of complete responses (CR) (3 = 23.1%) was registered in Arm A. Overall, the SPG treatment does not seem to have induced significan t changes of the immunological parameters of our patients: this may be due to both the advanced cancer stage and the effect of chemotherapy, which are both well known causes of immunodepression. The significant differences between the two Arms were only: the CD8(+) lymphocytes we re decreased in the patients treated with SPG and increased in control s; serum levels of IL-1 alpha was lower in patients treated with SPG t han in the control group; the production in culture of IL-1 alpha was higher in Arm A than in Arm B and IL-6 was higher in Arm B than in Arm A. Treatment with SPG was proven safe and was well-toleratedby all pa tients.