CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SCHIZOPHYLLAN (SPG) IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
G. Mantovani et al., CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SCHIZOPHYLLAN (SPG) IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA, International journal of oncology, 10(1), 1997, pp. 213-221
A phase II randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the
clinical efficacy and tolerability of Schizophyllan (SPG) used in com
bination with standard chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in pati
ents with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Seve
ral immunological parameters were considered to assess the immunoregul
atory activity of SPG in the: same patients. The clinical and immunolo
gical evaluations were performed both before and at the end of the stu
dy (4 months later). All patients received standard chemotherapy for h
ead and neck squamous cell carcinoma according to one of the following
treatment regimens: 1) cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 1,000 m
g/m(2) i.v. continuous infusion days 1 to 5; 2) cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i
.v, day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) i.v. over 4 h days 2 to 5, vinorelbine 20
mg/m(2) i.v. days 2 and 8. Antineoplastic regimens were repeated every
28 days x 4 cycles for approximately 4 months. SPG was administered w
eekly at a single dose of 40 mg intramuscularly for 4 months in additi
on to standard chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the
study, 22 of whom were evaluable. Thirteen patients were assigned to A
rm A (treatment with SPG associated with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2)
and 9 patients to Arm B (treatment with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2,
alone). The overall response rate was not significantly different bet
ween the two Arms (92.3% in Arm A vs. 100% in Arm B), although a highe
r number of complete responses (CR) (3 = 23.1%) was registered in Arm
A. Overall, the SPG treatment does not seem to have induced significan
t changes of the immunological parameters of our patients: this may be
due to both the advanced cancer stage and the effect of chemotherapy,
which are both well known causes of immunodepression. The significant
differences between the two Arms were only: the CD8(+) lymphocytes we
re decreased in the patients treated with SPG and increased in control
s; serum levels of IL-1 alpha was lower in patients treated with SPG t
han in the control group; the production in culture of IL-1 alpha was
higher in Arm A than in Arm B and IL-6 was higher in Arm B than in Arm
A. Treatment with SPG was proven safe and was well-toleratedby all pa
tients.