G. Tsebelis et G. Garrett, AGENDA-SETTING POWER, POWER INDEXES, AND DECISION-MAKING IN THE EUROPEAN-UNION, International review of law and economics, 16(3), 1996, pp. 345-361
The effective end in the mid-1980s of unanimity voting in the European
Union has greatly increased interest in its policy-making process, Tw
o basic frameworks have been offered to understand legislative dynamic
s in Europe: power index analyses of bargaining in the Council of Mini
sters based on cooperative game theory; and, noncooperative institutio
nal analyses of the interactions among the Council, the Commission, an
d the European Parliament. We argue that the institutional approach ge
nerates considerably more insight into European policy making than doe
s power index analysis. There are two major weaknesses in the power in
dex approach. First, it fails to take into account the effects of diff
erences in policy preferences of member governments on bargaining dyna
mics in the Council. Second, power index studies underestimate the imp
ortant roles played by the Commission and the European Parliament unde
r most of the legislative procedures used in Europe today. Our institu
tional analysis remedies these weaknesses by analyzing the impact on p
olicy outcomes in terms of differences in the institutional location o
f agenda-setting power and veto power.