Gk. Ogilvie et al., RESTING ENERGY-EXPENDITURE IN DOGS WITH NONHEMATOPOIETIC MALIGNANCIESBEFORE AND AFTER EXCISION OF TUMORS, American journal of veterinary research, 57(10), 1996, pp. 1463-1467
Objective-To determine whether apparently resting dogs with nonhematop
oietic malignancies have increased resting energy expenditure (REE), c
ompared with clinically normal dogs. Animals-46 client-owned dogs with
nonhematopoietic malignancies and 30 client-owned dogs that were clin
ically normal. Procedure-Apparently resting, client-owned dogs with no
nhematopoietic malignancies before (n = 46) and 4 to 6 weeks after (n
= 30) surgical removal of tumors were compared with apparently resting
, clinically normal, client-owned dogs in = 30). An open flow indirect
calorimetry system was used to determine the following: rate of oxyge
n consumption (ml/min/kg of body weight); rate of carbon dioxide produ
ction (mis/min/kg), REE (kcal/kg/d), and respiratory quotient. Because
of the wide range of body weight, REE and oxygen consumption were als
o expressed per kg of body weight(0.75). Results-Surgical removal of t
he tumor did not significantly alter any of the variables measured whe
n all dogs with tumors were assessed as a single group, or when the do
gs were divided on the basis of having the following types of tumors:
carcinomas and sarcomas, osteosarcomas, and mammary adenocarcinomas. N
one of the data obtained prior to surgical treatment from any of the d
ogs grouped by tumor type were significantly different from clinically
normal dogs. Conclusions-REE (54.4 +/- 16 kcal/kg/d or 125 +/- 19 kca
l/kg(0.75)/d) and, presumably, caloric requirements of dogs with nonhe
matopoietic malignancies are not significantly different from those ob
tained from clinically normal dogs (53.9 +/- 16 kcal/kg/d or 116 +/- 3
2 kcal/kg(0.75)/d). Furthermore, these variables do not change signifi
cantly when the tumor is excised and the dog is reassessed after 4 to
6 weeks. Clinical Relevance-Knowledge that REE in dogs with solid tumo
rs is not significantly different from REE of clinically normal dogs m
ay be of value when planning nutritional treatment for dogs with nonhe
matopoietic malignancies.