ETHICAL AND PRACTICE CONSIDERATIONS FOR BIOFEEDBACK THERAPISTS IN THETREATMENT OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE

Citation
P. Paul et al., ETHICAL AND PRACTICE CONSIDERATIONS FOR BIOFEEDBACK THERAPISTS IN THETREATMENT OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE, Biofeedback and self-regulation, 21(3), 1996, pp. 229-240
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
03633586
Volume
21
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
229 - 240
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-3586(1996)21:3<229:EAPCFB>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The treatment of incontinence presents many unique issues for biofeedb ack therapists that are routine for professionals in fields such as nu rsing or medicine. Although all professional practice is guided by eth ical standards, the unique circumstances encountered during biofeedbac k treatments for this disorder warrant the development of specific gui delines. This is true whether insertable or surface EMG devices are us ed. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to propose a set of ethi cal guidelines for biofeedback therapists. The intended audience inclu des professionals such as psychologists, clinical psychophysiologists, and other mental health-care providers who use biofeedback techniques . These are not formally endorsed by any professional organizations (e .g., APA, AAPB) at this time. Ethical considerations include proper me dical evaluation, informed consent, patient instruction, disrobing, no nerotic physical contact, patient safety, and patient satisfaction.