P. Paul et al., ETHICAL AND PRACTICE CONSIDERATIONS FOR BIOFEEDBACK THERAPISTS IN THETREATMENT OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE, Biofeedback and self-regulation, 21(3), 1996, pp. 229-240
The treatment of incontinence presents many unique issues for biofeedb
ack therapists that are routine for professionals in fields such as nu
rsing or medicine. Although all professional practice is guided by eth
ical standards, the unique circumstances encountered during biofeedbac
k treatments for this disorder warrant the development of specific gui
delines. This is true whether insertable or surface EMG devices are us
ed. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to propose a set of ethi
cal guidelines for biofeedback therapists. The intended audience inclu
des professionals such as psychologists, clinical psychophysiologists,
and other mental health-care providers who use biofeedback techniques
. These are not formally endorsed by any professional organizations (e
.g., APA, AAPB) at this time. Ethical considerations include proper me
dical evaluation, informed consent, patient instruction, disrobing, no
nerotic physical contact, patient safety, and patient satisfaction.