El. Bokey et al., MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY FOR CANCER, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 39(10), 1996, pp. 24-28
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare morbidity, mortality, an
d pathology after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy (LARHC
) or open right hemicolectomy (ORHC) for cancer of the right colon. ME
THODS: Patients undergoing either LARHC or ORHC for invasive carcinoma
of the right colon during a 30-month period were studied. Data were c
ollected from two sources. All morbidity, mortality, and pathology dat
a were collected prospectively in a form suitable for computer storage
and analysis as part of the ongoing Concord Hospital Colorectal Cance
r Registry. Data concerning in hospital course were obtained by caseno
te review. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent LARHC, and 33 had
an ORHC during the study period. The two groups were well matched with
respect to age, sex, weight, associated comorbidities, and tumor stag
e. Mean operating room use time was significantly higher for LARHC (LA
RHC = 261 minutes; ORHC = 203 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean hospital stay
from date of resection was the same in both groups (LARHC = 12 days; O
RHC = 12.2 days). There was no significant difference between procedur
es with respect to postoperative complications, return of gastrointest
inal function, or narcotic analgesic requirements. There was a signifi
cant shorter distal margin of resection in the LARHC group (ORHC = 13.
4 cm; LARHC = 10 cm; P = 0.03.). Total cost was significantly greater
for LARHC ($9,064 vs. $7,881 (Australian); P < 0.001). Median follow-u
p was 23.4 months for the LARHC group and 23.9 months for the ORHC gro
up. To date, there have been no local or port site recurrences. CONCLU
SION: Although there is no difference in morbidity and mortality follo
wing LARHC or ORHC, there is no apparent benefit for LARHC.