Physicians have used intra- and periarticular corticosteroids for trea
ting a variety of rheumatic diseases for nearly 50 years. Yet publicat
ions that have carefully examined the mechanisms of action, the pharma
cokinetics and the comparative safety and efficacy of the available ag
ents are sparse. This limits our ability to choose a drug scientifical
ly. Similarly, we know little about the long term outcomes of joints i
njected with corticosteroids versus those not injected. Highly branche
d esters of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone are the preferred agen
ts used by American rheumatologists. Pharmacokinetic studies reveal th
at triamcinolone hexacetonide, the least soluble of all the corticoste
roid esters, is retained in the joint for 2 to 3 weeks. Intra-articula
r corticosteroids may implement their anti-inflammatory effect by down
-regulating genetic expression of several pro-inflammatory proteins. A
literature review suggests that judicious use of intra- and periartic
ular corticosteroids is very helpful in temporarily reducing pain and
inflammation in musculoskeletal structures and may facilitate increase
d motion and function in selected cases. Their use in juvenile arthrit
is also appears to be safe and beneficial. Infection in or about the j
oint is the chief contraindication to use. Adverse effects are very fe
w but the number of injections per joint should probably be limited to
4 or less per year.