MALE AND FEMALE PERFORMANCE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS

Objective: To examine the validity of the assertion that men and women do not differ significantly on the Assessment of Motor and Process Sk ills (AMPS), a functional assessment tool used to evaluate the interac tion between component motor and process skills and IADL (instrumental or domestic activities of daily living) performance capacity. Design: Descriptive comparison. Using many-faceted Rasch analysis, the AMPS m otor and process scales were examined for differential item response b etween gender subgroups. Mean motor and process ability measures of ag e-matched groups of male and female subjects were also compared. Parti cipants: A convenience sample of more than 3,500 men and women from th e standardization sample for the pilot version of the AMPS computer-sc oring software. The subjects had a variety of physical disabilities or psychiatric diagnoses. Main Outcome Measures: Hypotheses were as foll ows: (1) no differential item response would be found on the motor or process scales; (2) if differential item response was found, it would not have an impact on the final estimation of client ability; (3) men and women would not differ in mean AMPS motor or process ability. Resu lts: Of the 36 AMPS items, only one (Lifts) differed between men and w omen. This differential item response did not disrupt the final estima tion of client ability. Men and women did not differ in mean motor abi lity. Women on the whole were more able than men in mean process abili ty. Conclusions: The AMPS is valid for use across Sender subgroups. Me n and women do not differ in AMPS motor ability, but overall, women ar e slightly more able than men in AMPS process ability. (C) 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation