HIV-1 PROTEASE INHIBITORS - A REVIEW FOR CLINICIAN

Citation
Sg. Deeks et al., HIV-1 PROTEASE INHIBITORS - A REVIEW FOR CLINICIAN, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 277(2), 1997, pp. 145-153
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00987484
Volume
277
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
145 - 153
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(1997)277:2<145:HPI-AR>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objective.-The clinical care of people infected with human immunodefic iency virus (HIV) has been substantially affected by the introduction of HIV-specific protease inhibitors (PIs). The 4 PIs available are saq uinavir mesylate, ritonavir, indinavir sulfate, and nelfinavir mesylat e. Comparison studies have not been reported; therefore, an assessment of the available data to aid clinicians and patients in choosing appr opriate treatment will be presented. Data Sources.-A systematic review of peer-reviewed publications, abstracts from national and internatio nal conferences, and product registration information through Septembe r 1996. Study Selection and Data Extraction.-Criteria used to select s tudies include their relevance to PIs, having been published in the En glish language, and pertinence for clinicians. Data quality and validi ty included the venue of the publication and relevance to clinical car e. Data Synthesis.-Oral adminstration of ritonavir, indinavir, or nelf inavir generates sustainable drug serum levels to effectively inhibit the protease enzyme; however, saquinavir may not generate sustained le vels necessary to inhibit the protease enzyme. Patients treated with r itonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir experience similar reductions in vi ral load and increases in CD4(+) lymphocytes; smaller effects occur am ong those treated with saquinavir. Two randomized placebo-controlled s tudies conducted among patients with severe immune system suppression and substantial zidovudine treatment experience demonstrated reduced H IV disease progression and reduced mortality with PI treatment. Genoty pic resistance to PIs occurs; the clinical relevance of resistance is unclear. The costs of these agents including required monitoring impos e new and substantial costs. Conclusions.-The PIs have emerged as crit ical drugs for people with HIV infection. Optimal use involves combina tion with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Resistance develops to eac h agent, and cross-resistance is likely. These agents must be used at full doses with attention to ensuring patient compliance. The expense of these agents may be offset by forestalling disease progression and death and returning people to productive life. Selecting the initial P I must be individualized, and factors to consider include proven activ ity, possible toxicities, dosing regimens, drug interactions, and cost s.