F. Gaspari et al., GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE DETERMINED FROM A SINGLE PLASMA SAMPLE AFTER INTRAVENOUS IOHEXOL INJECTION - IS IT RELIABLE, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 7(12), 1996, pp. 2689-2693
The iohexol injection plasma clearance method is a good alternative to
the inulin clearance method for determination of GFR, but requires mu
ltiple blood samples, To avoid this, methods have been developed which
derive GFR from a formula that uses a single plasma concentration of
the tracer and anthropometric data. The aim of this study was to evalu
ate whether a single plasma sample taken after iohexol injection allow
s reliable estimation of GFR, In this study, results of single-point d
etermination were compared with those obtained by multiple-point plasm
a clearance. The GFR of 686 outpatients with different degrees of rena
l function were recalculated by use of the Jacobsson formula, The opti
mum time for sampling was found at 10 h after injection of the marker
for clearances <40 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), 4 h for clearances between 40
and 99 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and 3 h for clearances >100 mL/min per 1
.73 m(2). Results documented that for 75% of the patients, the simplif
ied technique gave an error between -5% to +5% in the evaluation of GF
R; for the remaining 25% of the patients, prediction error ranged from
-22% to +40%, Furthermore, despite a highly significant correlation b
etween multiple-point iohexol clearance (six plasma samples) and the s
ingle-point method (Y = 0.968X + 1.704, r(2) = 0.988), the regression
intercept was statistically different from 0 and the standard error of
the slope estimate established that 95% confidence interval did not i
nclude 1.0 (the line of identity), thus indicating that the model can
be rejected by the data at a significance level of 0.05. Thus the sing
le-plasma-sample method to determine GFR after radio-contrast injectio
n does not represent a real advantage over the multiple-point method a
nd may lead to unacceptable errors in GFR calculation.