For a number of reasons, the discipline of psychology has not contribu
ted substantially to the affirmative action debate. One of the major r
easons is that psychologists have taken a ''trapped'' orientation to a
nalysis of the psychology of affirmative action. That trapped orientat
ion has caused psychologists to engage in miraculous theorizing, where
by there are significant policy-relevant gaps in the models used in po
licy analysis. These problems are identified and analyzed, and a more
productive alternative approach to the analysis of the psychology of a
ffirmative action is outlined and reviewed.