SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY AND THE AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION DEBATE

Authors
Citation
Rw. Nacoste, SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY AND THE AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION DEBATE, Journal of social and clinical psychology, 15(3), 1996, pp. 261-282
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical","Psychology, Social
ISSN journal
07367236
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
261 - 282
Database
ISI
SICI code
0736-7236(1996)15:3<261:SATAD>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
For a number of reasons, the discipline of psychology has not contribu ted substantially to the affirmative action debate. One of the major r easons is that psychologists have taken a ''trapped'' orientation to a nalysis of the psychology of affirmative action. That trapped orientat ion has caused psychologists to engage in miraculous theorizing, where by there are significant policy-relevant gaps in the models used in po licy analysis. These problems are identified and analyzed, and a more productive alternative approach to the analysis of the psychology of a ffirmative action is outlined and reviewed.