A number of different methods are used for the measurement of gastric
emptying in humans, and all have some advantages and disadvantages. Th
e method of choice will depend on whether solid or liquid meals are to
be studied, the level of precision required, the degree of invasivene
ss that the subject or patient will tolerate, ethical considerations,
and the facilities available. It is easier to measure the emptying of
liquid meals, but the emptying of solid meals is the true reflection o
f what happens during normal life, and is therefore of more clinical i
mportance. Scintigraphy, with appropriate labelling of the test meal c
omponents and appropriate corrections applied to the images obtained,
is the method of choice for clinical investigation of disturbed emptyi
ng patterns and can be applied to solid or liquid meals, but its appli
cation is limited by the need to restrict exposure to ionizing radiati
on. The double sampling gastric aspiration technique allows serial mea
surements of the composition of the gastric contents and of the volume
and composition of gastric secretions but can be used only with liqui
d meals. Other imaging techniques (ultrasound, MRI) and epigastric imp
edance measurements produce results that correlate well with those obt
ained by scintigraphy or aspiration. MRI has the unique feature of all
owing the physician to follow gastric emptying while at the same time
being able to observe any morphological abnormalities which may contri
bute to abnormal gastric function. Tracer methods, such as following t
he appearance in blood of paracetamol, may be useful for screening pur
poses in large populations. Regardless of the method used, the investi
gator must be aware of the large interindividual variability which exi
sts in the rate of gastric emptying in normal healthy individuals and
of the factors known to influence the gastric pattern.