Gu. Mullerlisse et al., MRI MONITORING BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER INTERSTITIAL LASER-INDUCED THERMOTHERAPY OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA - FIRST CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE, Radiologe, 36(9), 1996, pp. 722-731
Purpose: To assess the clinical value of MRI in patients with benign p
rostatic hyperplasia (BPH) before, during, and after interstitial lase
r-induced thermotherapy (LITT) of the prostate. Methods: Ten patients
with symptomatic BPH had MRI examinations of the prostate 48 h before
and after LITT. Online monitoring with MRI at 1.5 T of interstitial Nd
:YAG laser energy deposition in the prostate was performed in two pati
ents, repeating a T1-weighted FLASH sequence (TR 100 ms, TE 5 ms, flip
angle 90 degrees) every 20 s. Follow-up MRI examinations 2-3 weeks, 6
-8 weeks, and 6-12 months after LITT were carried out in eight patient
s, using T2-weighted FSE images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted SE i
mages. Results: The prostate was well delineated in all patients on T2
-weighted FSE images, with a rather homogeneous peripheral gland and a
n inhomogeneous central gland. Volume measurements yielded reproducibi
lities of 3.2 %-4.7 %. Signal intensity in the FLASH sequence decrease
d during LITT, both in the prostate in vivo and in specimens of bovine
prostate and seminal vesicles in vitro, with signal developments runn
ing in parallel. Areas of energy deposition and signal alteration were
not sharply delineated. The latter margin of the laser-induced lesion
s could not be predicted from the FLASH images, while the tip of the l
aser fibre was easily recognized. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR ima
ges immediately after LITT clearly demarcated low signal intensity las
er lesions from high signal intensity surrounding prostate tissue. Fol
low-up examinations showed a decrease of 20 % of prostate volume over
a period of 6-12 months after LITT. Correlation between prostate volum
e development and lesion volume alteration was 0.85-0.90 (P = 0.002-0.
007) at all follow-up times. Conclusions: MRI allows rather precise re
cognition of intraprostatic alterations after LITT, including volume c
hanges over a period of up to 1 year after therapy that can be predict
ed immediately after LITT. While laser energy deposition in the prosta
te can be monitored by MRI with T1-weighted FLASH sequences as a funct
ion of temperature alteration, it is not possible to determine the les
ion margins immediately from the FLASH images. Online temperature deve
lopment map generation will be necessary to influence ongoing LITT pro
cedures with MRI.