Ema. Bleiker et al., PERSONALITY-FACTORS AND BREAST-CANCER DEVELOPMENT - A PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL-STUDY, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88(20), 1996, pp. 1478-1482
Background: It has been estimated that approximately 25% of all breast
cancers in women can be explained by currently recognized somatic her
editary and physiologic) risk factors, It has also been hypothesized t
hat psychological factors may play a role in the development of breast
cancer. Purpose: We investigated the extent to which personality fact
ors, in addition to somatic risk factors, may be associated with the d
evelopment of primary breast cancer, Methods: We employed a prospectiv
e, longitudinal study design, From 1989 through 1990, a personality qu
estionnaire was sent to all female residents of the Dutch city of Nijm
egen who were 43 years of age or older, This questionnaire was sent as
part of an invitation to participate in a population-based breast can
cer screening program, Women who developed breast cancer among those w
ho returned completed questionnaires were compared with women without
such a diagnosis in regard to somatic risk factors and personality tra
its, including anxiety, anger, depression, rationality, anti-emotional
ity (i.e., an absence of emotional behavior or a lack of trust in one'
s own feelings), understanding, optimism, social support, and the expr
ession and control of emotions. Conditional logistic regression analys
is was used to identify variables that could best explain group member
ship (i.e., belonging to the case [breast cancer] or the control [with
out disease] group), Results: Personality questionnaires were sent to
28 940 women, and 9705 (34%) were returned in such a way that they cou
ld be used for statistical analyses, Among the 9705 women who returned
useable questionnaires, 131 were diagnosed with breast cancer during
the period from 1989 through 1994. Seven hundred seventy-one age-match
ed control subjects (up to six per case patient) were selected for the
analyses, Three variables were found to be statistically significantl
y associated with an increased risk of breast cancer: 1) having a firs
t-degree family member with breast cancer (versus not having an affect
ed first-degree relative, odds ratio [OR] = 4.05; 95% confidence inter
val [CI] = 1.76-9.31); 2) nulliparity (i.e., having no children) (vers
us having had a child before the age of 30 years, OR = 2.67; 95% CI =
1.26-5.68); and 3) a relatively high score on the personality scale of
anti-emotionality (versus a low score, OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.05-1.35)
. Conclusions and Implications: With the exception of a weak associati
on between a high score on the anti-emotionality scale and the develop
ment of breast cancer, no support was found for the hypothesis that pe
rsonality traits can differentiate between groups of women with and wi
thout breast cancer. We recommend that this study be continued and tha
t other studies be encouraged to explore possible relationships betwee
n personality factors and the risk of breast cancer.