A COMPARISON OF 2 CONTROL-DISPLAY GAIN MEASURES FOR HEAD-CONTROLLED COMPUTER INPUT DEVICES

Citation
Ja. Schaab et al., A COMPARISON OF 2 CONTROL-DISPLAY GAIN MEASURES FOR HEAD-CONTROLLED COMPUTER INPUT DEVICES, Human factors, 38(3), 1996, pp. 390-403
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Ergonomics,"Psychology, Applied",Ergonomics,Psychology,"Behavioral Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00187208
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
390 - 403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-7208(1996)38:3<390:ACO2CG>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We compared two gain measures: One, defined as angle/angle (A/A) gain, is the ratio between the angle subtended by displacement of the curso r and the corresponding angle of head estension/flexion or rotation. T he alternative measure, defined as displacement/angle (D/A) gain, is t he ratio between the linear displacement of the cursor on the screen a nd the corresponding angle of head extension/flexion or rotation. A di screte target acquisition task using circular targets was used to comp are control-display gain measures, Operator performance was evaluated for three viewing distances and three gain settings of each measure. A verage movement time and root mean squared (RMS) cursor deviation from a straight line path increased as viewing distance increased for A/A gain settings 0.75 and 1.0. That no significant distance effect was ob served for any of the D/A gain settings indicated that it might be mor e suitable to fix D/A gain rather than A/A gain for head-controlled co mputer input devices. Minimum movement time occurred for D/A gain sett ings of 0.5 cm/degrees and 0.67 cm/degrees. One explanation for the ob served insensitivity of performance to changes in viewing distance wit h a fixed D/A gain may be that both angular head movement and the acco mpanying kinesthetic feedback do not change for a specified cursor dis placement as viewing distance is changed.