EFFECTS OF PRIMING ON THE NAMING ACCURACY OF PRESCHOOLERS WITH WORD-FINDING DEFICITS

Citation
Kk. Mcgregor et J. Windsor, EFFECTS OF PRIMING ON THE NAMING ACCURACY OF PRESCHOOLERS WITH WORD-FINDING DEFICITS, Journal of speech and hearing research, 39(5), 1996, pp. 1048-1058
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics",Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
00224685
Volume
39
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1048 - 1058
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4685(1996)39:5<1048:EOPOTN>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Eight preschoolers with word-finding (WF] deficits and 16 controls wit h normal word-finding abilities (8 preschoolers and 8 adults) named 40 pictured objects under primed and unprimed conditions. Each picture c ould be correctly labeled with a simple noun or a compound (e.g., cane or walking stick). The primed condition involved semantic primes for both the simple and compound targets as well as a partial lexical prim e for the compound targets. All participant groups decreased naming er rors when given the primes. Two results indicated that the participant s made use of the lexical primes. The first was a shift in form of cor rect responses from simple nouns In the unprimed condition to compound nouns in the primed condition. The second was an increase in errors t hat incorporated the lexical prime in the primed condition. There were limits to the benefit that the WF group derived from the primes. Firs t, the primes did not enable the WF group to compensate fully for thei r naming problems. The gap between the error rates of the WF group and the control groups was not reduced in the primed condition. Second, t he quality of errors made by the WF group did not improve in response to primes. Compared to the controls, the WF group made proportionately more errors that indicated no access to the target neighborhood (part icularly ''I don't know'' responses) in the unprimed condition. With p rimes, the controls further reduced their use of these errors, but the WF group did not. When members of the control groups did make errors, they were more likely than the WF children to produce a word substitu tion that bore a close semantic, visual, or phonological relation to t he target in both unprimed and primed conditions. These limitations on the benefit of priming for participants in the WF group suggest defic iencies in size, elaboration, or organization of their lexicons.