This study compared the different calculation methods of the solid gas
tric emptying lag phase and evaluated the effect of the temporal sampl
ing interval on the calculated value using the modified power exponent
ial (WIPE) method. Methods: Twenty normal control subjects and 42 pati
ents had anterior and posterior image acquisition on a multihead gamma
camera, one frame per minute x 90. ROls were selected for the stomach
, gastric antrum and small bowel. Time-activity curves (TACs) were gen
erated for anterior, posterior and geometric mean data. The lag phase
was calculated using various methods such as transition point, startin
g index, first appearance of bower activity (FABA), WIPE and antral pe
ak filling time. To determine the importance of the temporal sampling
rate on the calculation of the lag phase by the WIPE, intervals betwee
n 1 and 20 min were analyzed. Results: The transition point, starting
index and FABA correlated extremely high (r = greater than or equal to
0.92) in normal control subjects and patients. Normal lag phase value
s were mean 22-24 +/- 10 min for transition point, starting index and
FABA compared with 47 +/- 18 min for the WIPE method (p < 0.0001). The
WIPE correlated poorly with the other methods (r = 0.74). Antral peak
filling time correlated poorly (r = 0.47) with transition point, star
ting index and FABA, but somewhat better with the MPE (r = 0.70). Comp
aring 15-min versus I-min sampling intervals using the WIPE, 35% of su
bjects had values that differed by greater than or equal to 7.5 min an
d 10% had values differing by greater than or equal to 15 min. Conclus
ion: The lag phase calculated by the WIPE correlated poorly with other
methods, and its accuracy was limited by the rate of the temporal sam
pling. The transition point, starting index and FABA all highly correl
ated with each other; the latter is a particularly reliable physiologi
cal indicator and is easily quantified using a small-bowel TAC.