Ap. Reynolds, COMPARISON OF R-CURVE METHODOLOGIES FOR RANKING THE TOUGHNESS OF ALUMINUM-ALLOYS, Journal of testing and evaluation, 24(6), 1996, pp. 406-410
In an effort to determine an optimum method for ranking the fracture t
oughness of developmental aluminum alloys over a wide range of fractur
e toughness/strength combinations, five labs performed R-curve testing
on aluminum alloy 2024-T3. Middle crack tension and compact tension R
-curve specimens were excised from a previously tested 1.5-m wide midd
le crack tension test specimen. The crack resistance curves generated
with the small specimens were compared to the R-curves from 1.5-m wide
specimens. The experimental program indicated that effective stress i
ntensity from secant compliance based crack length and stress intensit
y calculated from J-integral testing were equivalent. Comparison of te
st results obtained from different specimen sizes and configurations i
ndicated that standard validity requirements for compact tension speci
mens may be overly restrictive. Improved correlation between specimen
types was obtained by plotting K-eff or K-J against physical crack ext
ension as compared to effective crack extension.