GENERAL DECOMPOSITIONS OF MSE-BASED SKILL SCORES - MEASURES OF SOME BASIC ASPECTS OF FORECAST QUALITY

Authors
Citation
Ah. Murphy, GENERAL DECOMPOSITIONS OF MSE-BASED SKILL SCORES - MEASURES OF SOME BASIC ASPECTS OF FORECAST QUALITY, Monthly weather review, 124(10), 1996, pp. 2353-2369
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00270644
Volume
124
Issue
10
Year of publication
1996
Pages
2353 - 2369
Database
ISI
SICI code
0027-0644(1996)124:10<2353:GDOMSS>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Skill scores defined as measures of relative mean square error-and bas ed on standards of reference representing climatology, persistence, or a linear combination of climatology and persistence-are decomposed. T wo decompositions of each skill score are formulated: i) a decompositi on derived by conditioning on the forecasts and 2) a decomposition der ived by conditioning on the observations. These general decompositions contain terms consisting of measures of statistical characteristics o f the forecasts and/or observations and terms consisting of measures o f basic aspects of forecast quality. Properties of the terms in the re spective decompositions are examined, and relationships among the vari ous skill scores-and the terms in the respective decompositions-are de scribed. Hypothetical samples of binary forecasts and observations are used to illustrate the application and interpretation of these decomp ositions. Limitations on the inferences that can be drawn from compara tive verification based on skill scores, as well as from comparisons b ased on the terms in decompositions of skill scores, are discussed. Th e relationship between the application of measures of aspects of quali ty and the application of the sufficiency relation (a statistical rela tion that embodies the concept of unambiguous superiority) is briefly explored. The following results can be gleaned from this methodologica l study. 1) Decompositions of skill scores provide quantitative measur es of-and insights into-multiple aspects of the forecasts, the observa tions, and their relationship. 2) Superiority in terms of overall skil l is no guarantor of superiority in terms of other aspects of quality. 3) Sufficiency (i.e., unambiguous superiority) generally cannot be in ferred solely on the basis of superiority over a relatively small set of measures of specific aspects of quality. Neither individual measure s of overall performance (e.g., skill scores) nor sets of measures ass ociated with decompositions of such overall measures respect the dimen sionality of most verification problems. Nevertheless, the decompositi ons described here identify parsimonious sets of measures of basic asp ects of forecast quality that should prove to be useful in many verifi cation problems encountered in the real world.