SOIL-WATER THRESHOLDS FOR THE RESPONSES OF LEAF EXPANSION AND GAS-EXCHANGE - A REVIEW

Citation
Vo. Sadras et Sp. Milroy, SOIL-WATER THRESHOLDS FOR THE RESPONSES OF LEAF EXPANSION AND GAS-EXCHANGE - A REVIEW, Field crops research, 47(2-3), 1996, pp. 253-266
Citations number
95
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
03784290
Volume
47
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
253 - 266
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-4290(1996)47:2-3<253:STFTRO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Typical responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange rate to plant ava ilable soil water (PAW) can be described with two straight Lines that intersect at PAW,, i.e., the PAW threshold for which the rate of the p rocess in stressed plants starts to diverge from a reference value. PA W, is a parameter widely used in modelling plant responses to water de ficits. It also reflects some apparent physiological mechanism because plants appear to be able to sense soil water status or related variab le(s). in this paper comparisons are made between PAW(t) for various s pecies (monocots and dicots) and plant processes (leaf expansion and g as exchange) in order to: (i) point out methodological sources of vari ation in published values of PAW(t); and (ii) analyse variations in PA W, in relation to plant and environmental factors. Reported values of PAW(t) vary over almost the whole possible range of PAW (i.e., 0 to 1) . Average thresholds reflect the greater responsiveness to water defic its of tissue expansion (average PAW(t) = 0.56) relative to gas exchan ge (0.40). Average PAW(t) for leaf water potential (0.61) and stomatal conductance (0.37) are very close to the average thresholds for expan sion and gas exchange, respectively. Soil water thresholds for leaf ex pansion are also shown to discriminate between plant types (0.50 for m onocots vs. 0.66 for dicots) and soils (0.72 for coarse- vs. 0.43 for fine-textured soils). The simplicity of characterising plant responses to water stress in terms of PAW is attractive. In agreement with know n physiological relationships, however, our analysis highlights how, f or given processes and species, the measured value of PAW, can be affe cted by evaporative demand, root distribution, soil texture and soil b ulk density, among other factors, thus making explicit some of the ass umptions underlying the use of fixed soil-water thresholds in simulati on models.