Introduction: Since 1988, more than 450 children have received cochlea
r implants at the Department of Otolaryngology of the Medizinische Hoc
hschule Hannover. Among them are 38 children who underwent surgery bef
ore the age of two. Due to increasing experience with this technique,
the mean age at implantation has decreased over time so that most chil
dren nowadays receive implants between the ages of two and five. In te
rms of the critical periods of both development of the auditory system
and the acquisition of language, it is advantageous for even younger
children to receive implants soon after detection of deafness. However
, the present diagnostic tools do not allow proper estimation of resid
ual hearing and additional handicaps. Therefore longer periods of hear
ing aid use and audioverbal training are mandatory before implantation
. Additional objections against early implantation are biosafety probl
ems such as head growth, the high incidence of otitis media, and the s
pecific surgical anatomy. This paper outlines criteria for patient sel
ection, the surgical concept, postoperative rehabilitation, and compli
cations. Patients: Twenty-six children suffered from postmeningitic de
afness and beginning obliteration of the cochlea as shown by repeated
high resolution CT scans. Nine children had congenital deafness which
was detected early in life and showed no improvement after proper hear
ing aid fitting and audioverbal training for speech development. Three
children had severe inner ear malformations detected by CT scans. All
children had no ABR or CAP responses in ECoG. Their developmental, la
nguage, and neuropaediatric status was examined. Surgery: Thirty-five
children received the Nucleus Mini 22 cochlear implant; three children
received the Clarion 1.2 device. The surgery was not different from a
dult surgery. Special care was given to proper fixation and placement
of the electrode in the drilled out mastoid to compensate for head gro
wth. Postoperative results: All children wear the speech processor reg
ularly. They are able to detect everyday sounds and suprasegmental fea
tures of speech after a few months. After one year, the child begins t
o understand and produce speech; after two years speech understanding
has been achieved and normal language development starts with small se
ntences. The complication rate was not higher than in other age groups
of patients. Fitting and tune-up of the speech processor required a b
road range of experience and a specialized team working at the childre
n's implant center. Conclusion: Early implantation in children is both
possible and effective in selected cases. Due to an improved early de
tection of deafness, it should be possible to increase the percentage
of children with early cochlear implantation.