G. Zernig et al., MECHANISM OF CLOCINNAMOX BLOCKADE OF OPIOID RECEPTORS - EVIDENCE FROMIN-VITRO AND EX-VIVO BINDING AND BEHAVIORAL ASSAYS, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 279(1), 1996, pp. 23-31
In behavioral experiments, the cinnamoylaminomorphinone clocinnamox (C
CAM) has been shown to act as an insurmountable antagonist of mu, but
not delta or kappa opioid agonists. In contrast, CCAM displayed only m
oderate mu selectivity (29:6:1 for mu:delta:kappa) in radioligand disp
lacement experiments using mouse brain membranes. In the present study
, the apparent discrepancy between the high mu selectivity of the insu
rmountable functional antagonism of CCAM and its only moderate mu sele
ctivity in in vitro binding experiments was resolved by in vitro washo
ut experiments and ex vivo binding experiments involving all three opi
oid receptor types. In the ex vitro washout experiments, CCAM-mediated
mu receptor binding inhibition could not be reversed even after allow
ing for 8 hr hr dissociation, whereas the CCAM inhibition of delta and
kappa receptor binding was time-dependently reversed. In the ex vivo
binding experiments, 1 hr pretreatment of mice with 10 mg/kg of CCAM i
.p. decreased ex vivo [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin ([H
-3]DAMGO) binding (tested at greater than or equal to 5 K-d) by 90%,
paralleled by an 88% decrease in mu receptor density in equilibrium s
aturation binding assays. Ex vivo [H-3]DAMGO binding returned to contr
ol levels with a T-1/2 of 2.7 to 4.2 days (independent of the CCAM dos
e), the effect being predominantly due to a recovery of mu receptor de
nsity. The CCAM inhibition of ex vivo [H-3]DAMGO binding was dose-depe
ndent and could be prevented in part by simultaneous administration of
the protein synthesis inhibitor cylcoheximide. In contrast to the ex
vivo binding of [H-3]DAMGO, ex vivo binding of p-[H-3]Cl-[D-Pen(2),D-P
en(5)]enkephalin or (-)-[H-3]bremazocine (in the presence of 1 mu M DA
MGO and 1 mu M [D-Pen(5),D-Pen(5)]enkephalin) was not affected by CCAM
pretreatment. Finally, ex vivo [H-3]DAMGO binding inhibition data cor
related well with mu receptor population changes estimated by Black an
d Leff anal ysis of behavioral (antinociception) experiments (T-1/2 of
receptor reappearance, 3.2 days). Thus, although CCAM reversibly inte
racted with mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors, only binding to mu r
eceptors was wash-resistant. Binding of methoclocinnamox, a codeinone
CCAM precursor with mu agonistic activity, seemed to be at least parti
ally reversible, even at mu receptors.