Ah. Lichtman et al., INHALATION EXPOSURE TO VOLATILIZED OPIOIDS PRODUCES ANTINOCICEPTION IN MICE, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 279(1), 1996, pp. 69-76
The goal of this study was to determine whether opioids of varying pot
encies are pharmacologically active via the inhalation route of admini
stration in mice. The opioids evaluated included heroin, morphine, cod
eine, fentanyl and meperidine; each of these drugs has the potential f
or abuse in humans. Inhalation exposure to each of these compounds pro
duced antinociception in a dose-dependent manner as assessed in the ta
il-flick test. No pyrolysis products were detected after heating eithe
r morphine or codeine at 250 degrees C for 5 min. Although 6-acetylmor
phine was found after heating heroin, it accounted for less than 5% of
the recovered sample. Heroin was somewhat less potent by inhalation a
dministration than i.v. injection, with ED(50) values of 1.6 and 0.69
mu mol/kg, respectively. In contrast, the relative potency of morphine
was substantially greater when inhaled than when injected, with respe
ctive ED(50) values of 0.77 and 3.9 mu mol/kg. Whereas the body to bra
in ratios of [H-3]morphine were approximately 8 and 20 for inhalation
exposure and i.v. injection, respectively, the ratio for heroin was ap
proximately 5 regardless of administration route. This pattern of resu
lts suggests that the increase in morphine potency upon inhalation may
have resulted from an increased accessibility to the brain compared w
ith i.v. injection. Finally, naloxone reversed the antinociceptive eff
ects of volatilized heroin, but neither the kappa selective antagonist
nor-binaltorphimine nor the delta selective antagonist naltrindole bl
ocked this antinociception, which suggests the involvement of mu opioi
d receptors. These findings taken together suggest the potential for t
he abuse of a variety of opioids, in addition to heroin, through the i
nhalation route of administration by humans.