Ra. Poot et al., THE CENTRAL PSEUDOKNOT IN 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA IS NEEDED FOR RIBOSOME STABILITY BUT IS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR 30S INITIATION COMPLEX-FORMATION, Nucleic acids research, 24(19), 1996, pp. 3670-3676
To examine the function of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA, we have
studied Escherichia coil 30S subunits with the A(18) mutation in this
structure element, Previously, this mutation, which changes the centr
al base pair of helix 2, C-18-G(917) to an A(18)xG(917) mismatch, was
shown to inhibit translation in vivo and a defect in initiation was su
ggested, Here, we find that the mutant 30S particles are impaired in f
orming 70S tight couples and predominantly accumulate as free 30S subu
nits, Formation of a 30S initiation complex, as measured by toeprintin
g, was almost as efficient for mutant 30S subunits, derived from the t
ight couple fraction, as for the wild-type control, However, the A(18)
mutation has a profound effect on the overall stability of the subuni
t, The mutant ribosomes were inactivated by affinity chromatography an
d high salt treatment, due to easy loss of ribosomal proteins, Accordi
ngly, the particles could be reactivated by partial in vitro reconstit
ution with 30S ribosomal proteins, Mutant 30S subunits from the free s
ubunit fraction were already inactive upon isolation, but could also b
e reactivated by reconstitution, Apparently, the inactivity in initiat
ion of these mutant 30S subunits is, at least in part, also due to the
lack of essential ribosomal proteins, We conclude that disruption of
helix 2 of the central pseudoknot by itself does not affect the format
ion of a 30S initiation complex, We suggest that the in vivo translati
onal defect of the mutant ribosomes is caused by their inability to fo
rm 70S initiation complexes.