Objectives. This study was designed to investigate the effect of stora
ge in water on bonding efficacy to enamel and dentin of four resin-mod
ified (Dyract, DeTrey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Corp.; Photac Fi
l, ESPE; Vitremer, 3M Dental Products), one conventional glass ionomer
filling material (Ketac Fil, ESPE) and a resin composite system (Peka
fill/Gluma bonding system, Bayer). The hypothesis was that water stora
ge would lead to an adverse effect on bond strength of resin-modified
glass ionomer cements to enamel and dentin. Methods. The shear bond st
rength of each material was determined after storage periods of 24 h,
1 wk, 1 mon, 3 mon and 6 mon. The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA
. Significant differences were determined by multiple comparison testi
ng (significance level 5%). The failure modes of the debonded specimen
s were analyzed with a dissecting microscope. Results. Shear bond stre
ngths to enamel for Dyract, Photac Fil and Pekafill were 5.2 +/- 1.3,
9.9 +/- 1.6 and 17.0 +/- 2.3 MPa, irrespective of storage time (p > 0.
05). For Ketac Fil, the average shear bond strength between 1 wk and 6
mon was 4.5 +/- 1.7 MPa, the mean value for Fuji II LC between 24 h a
nd 3 mon was 10.3 +/- 3.9 MPa and after 6 mon was 19.8 +/- 4.4 MPa, wh
ile Vitremer showed increasing shear bond strengths between 24 h (2.4
+/- 0.8 MPa) and 1, 3 and 6 mon (13.8 +/- 4.3 MPa). Shear bond strengt
hs to dentin were not adversely affected by storage throughout the 6 m
on for Dyract (13.0 +/- 2.6 MPa), Fuji II LC (12.7 +/- 1.7 MPa) and Pe
kafill (14.6 +/- 3.1 MPa), when tested by ANOVA (p > 0.05). Ketac Fil
showed 4.9 +/- 1.2 MPa between 1 wk and 6 mon and lower shear bond str
ength after 24 h. The average shear bond strengths up to 1 mon for Vit
remer were 5.4 +/- 2.5 MPa (p > 0.05). However, at 3 and 6 mon immersi
on in water, three specimens had loosened spontaneously. With Photac F
il, no adhesion to dentin was registered. Most samples showed cohesive
failure patterns in the restorative materials. Adhesive or mixed fail
ures were registered only for Vitremer on dentin and enamel up to 1 wk
and for Dyract on enamel. Significance. Long-term water storage gener
ally had no adverse effect on bonding efficacy of resin-modified glass
ionomer cements to dentin and enamel.