Kuhn (1994) argues that small lithic tools provide an optimal means of
reducing the weight of mobile tool kits while maximizing potential ut
ility. This assertion contradicts much of the current thinking about m
obility and the organization of lithic technology and is at odds with
the archaeological record. A flaw in Kuhn's equation for calculating t
he utility/mass ratio of retouched tools leads him to this erroneous c
onclusion. Problems with Kuhn's utility/mass ratio equation are descri
bed and an alternative formula is offered. The corrected formula indic
ates that larger stone toots maximize utility at a longer transport co
st. Experimental evidence for additional advantages of larger stone to
ols is also provided.