Objective-To assess the effect of ACE inhibition on left ventricular f
illing and wall motion in patients with a clinical diagnosis of heart
failure. Design-Prospective examination of left ventricular systolic a
nd diastolic function using M mode echocardiography and pulsed and con
tinuous wave Doppler before and three weeks after starting an ACE inhi
bitor. Setting-A tertiary referral centre for cardiac disease equipped
with non-invasive facilities. Subjects-30 outpatients with a clinical
diagnosis of heart failure in whom treatment with an ACE inhibitor wa
s started; age 61 (SD 11) years; 27 male; 3 female; 21 healthy control
s of similar age. Results-Left ventricular cavity was dilated both at
end systole and end diastole, and fractional shortening reduced. Altho
ugh mean isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) and transmitral E (early
) to A (late) filling velocity (EIA) ratio were not different from nor
mal, a value of 1.0 on the normal frequency plot of the E/A ratio divi
ded the patients bimodally into two groups: 20 patients (group A) with
E/A ratio > 1.0 and 10 patients (group B) < 1.0. In group A patients,
IVRT was short as was transmitral E wave deceleration time compared t
o normal (P < 0.001), fulfilling the criteria of restrictive left vent
ricular physiology. Left ventricular wall motion during IVRT was coord
inate and left ventricular end diastolic pressure was raised on the ap
excardiogram (P < 0.001). In group B, E wave deceleration time was lon
ger, relaxation incoordinate, and apexcardiogram normal. With an ACE i
nhibitor: in group A, left ventricular dimensions fell at end diastole
(P < 0.05) and end systole (P < 0.01) but fractional shortening did n
ot change; long axis total excursion (P < 0.01) and peak rate of short
ening (P < 0.05) both increased; IVRT increased (P < 0.001) with the a
ppearance of markedly incoordinate wall motion, minor axis lengthening
, and long axis shortening (P < 0.001 for both); A wave amplitude also
consistently increased (P < 0.001); finally, transmitral E wave veloc
ity fell and A wave velocity increased. ACE inhibition did not alter a
ny of the left ventricular minor and long axis or transmitral Doppler
variables in patients in group B. Conclusions-Patients with a clinical
diagnosis of heart failure differ in their presentation and response
to ACE inhibition according to baseline haemodynamics. In restrictive
left ventricular physiology, ACE inhibition reduces cavity size and pr
olongs IVRT, compatible with a fall in left atrial pressure. At the sa
me time, ventricular relaxation becomes very delayed and incoordinate,
greatly reducing early diastolic left ventricular filling velocity. T
hus ACE inhibition unmasks major diastolic abnormalities in patients w
ith restrictive left ventricular disease.