QUANTITATIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY-HYPERTENSION AND COMPRESSED LEFT-VENTRICLES - COMPARISON WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
Hd. Apfel et al., QUANTITATIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY-HYPERTENSION AND COMPRESSED LEFT-VENTRICLES - COMPARISON WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, HEART, 76(4), 1996, pp. 350-354
Objective-To evaluate the accuracy of quantitative three dimensional e
chocardiography in patients with deformed left ventricles Design-Three
dimensional and cross sectional echocardiographic estimates of left v
entricular volume and ejection fraction were prospectively compared to
those obtained from magnetic resonance imaging. Setting-Echocardiogra
phy laboratory of a university hospital. Patients-26 patients (9 month
s to 42 years, median age 11 years) with pulmonary hypertension and fi
xed reversal of normal interventricular septal curvature.Main outcome
measures-Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volumes and e
jection fraction. Results-Three dimensional echocardiographic comparis
on to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yielded r values of 0.94 and 0.
87 with a bias of - 6.9 (SD 6.9) ml and - 16 (11.2) ml for systolic an
d diastolic volumes respectively. Interobserver variability was minima
l (8.3% and 7.6% respectively). Cross sectional echocardiography gave
correlation coefficients of 0.62 and 0.80 and bias of 3.1 (14.1) ml an
d 16.3 (18.3) ml for systolic and diastolic volumes respectively. Ejec
tion fraction by three dimensional echocardiography also had closer ag
reement with MRI (bias = 1.1 (7.7)%) than cross sectional echocardiogr
aphy (bias = 4.4 (13.9)%). Conclusions-Three dimensional echocardiogra
phy provides reliable estimates of left ventricular volumes and ejecti
on fraction, comparable to magnetic resonance imaging in pulmonary hyp
ertension patients with compressed ventricular geometry. Because it el
iminates the need for geometric assumptions it shows closer agreement
with magnetic resonance imaging in that setting than cross sectional e
chocardiography.