EFFECT OF FLUMAZENIL ON VENTILATORY DRIVE DURING SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND ALFENTANIL

Citation
Jb. Gross et al., EFFECT OF FLUMAZENIL ON VENTILATORY DRIVE DURING SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND ALFENTANIL, Anesthesiology, 85(4), 1996, pp. 713-720
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
85
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
713 - 720
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1996)85:4<713:EOFOVD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background: Patients who receive a combination of a benzodiazepine and an oploid for conscious sedation are at risk for developing respirato ry depression. While flumazenil effectively antagonizes the respirator y depression associated with a benzodiazepine alone, its efficacy in t he presence of both a benzodiazepine and an opioid has not been establ ished. This study was designed to determine whether flumazenil can rev erse benzodiazepine-induced depression of ventilatory drive in the pre sence of an opioid. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers completed this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Ventilatory responses to ca rbon dioxide and to isocapnic hypoxia were determined during four trea tment phases: (1) baseline, (2) alfentanil infusion; (3) combined mida zolam and alfentanil infusions, and (4) combined alfentanil midazolam, and ''study drug'' (consisting of either flumazenil or flumazenil veh icle) infusions. Subjects returned 2-6 weeks later to receive the alte rnate study drug. Results: Alfentanil decreased the slope of the carbo n dioxide response curve from 2.14 +/- 0.40 to 1.43 +/- 0.19 1 . min(- 1). mmHg(-1) (x+/-SE, P < 0.05), and decreased the minute ventilation at PETCO2 = 50 mmHg (V(E)50) from 19.7 +/- 1.2 to 14.8 +/- 0.91 . min( -1)(P < 0.05). Midazolam further reduced these variables to 0.87 +/- 0 .171 . min(-1). mmHg(-1) (P < 0.05) and 11.7 +/- 0.81 . min(-1) (P < 0 .05), respectively. With addition of flumazenil, slope and V(E)50 incr eased to 1.47 +/- 0.37 1 . min(-1). mmHg(-1) (P < 0.05) and 16.4 +/- 2 .01 . min(-1) (P < 0.05); after placebo, the respective values of 1.02 +/- 0.19 1 . min(-1). mmHg(-1) and 12.5 +/- 1.2 1 . min(-1) did not d iffer significantly from their values during combined alfentanil and m idazolam administration. The effect of flumazenil differed significant ly from that of placebo (P < 0.05). Both the slope and the displacemen t of the hypoxic ventilatory response, measured at PETCO2 = 46 +/- 1 m mHg, were affected similarly, with flumazenil showing a significant im provement compared to placebo. Conclusions: Flumazenil effectively rev erses the benzodiazepine component of ventilatory depression during co mbined administration of a benzodiazepine and an opioid.