The recently proposed (ideal) type of a modern political party, the 'c
artel party', evokes questions both about the conceptual clarity of th
e new type and about its empirical validity. The analysis of the relat
ionship between civil society and the state, which constitutes a centr
al element in Katz and Mair's concept of the cartel party, is consider
ed to be too static to grasp the increased intervention by the state i
n society. The application of a term derived from the level of the par
ty system ('cartel') to individual parties does not seem to be a happy
choice, while the reality of western party systems does not show an e
ffective cartel of parties. It is argued that, instead of trying to fo
rmulate (again) an alleged dominant party type for the present time, i
t seems more fruitful to develop a classification scheme of parties th
at allows for different types of parties to co-exist at the same time,
without considering one of them as the most up to date.