COMPARISON OF FIELD METHODS FOR SELECTION OF PROTEIN AND OIL CONTENT IN SOYBEAN

Citation
Dl. Pazdernik et al., COMPARISON OF FIELD METHODS FOR SELECTION OF PROTEIN AND OIL CONTENT IN SOYBEAN, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 76(4), 1996, pp. 721-725
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences",Agriculture
ISSN journal
00084220
Volume
76
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
721 - 725
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4220(1996)76:4<721:COFMFS>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] is known for its high protein and oil content but a gradual decline has been reported in protein content of soybeans grown in the northern latitudes during the past 10 to 15 yr. Due to this decline, research investigating breeding methods aimed at improving protein content in soybean is needed. The objectives of thi s study were to compare soybean protein and oil content of: (i) row vs . hill plots, (ii) sampling at the end vs. center of the row, (iii) sh ort, one-row plots at one location vs. long, four-row plots at two loc ations, and (iv) to assess the heritability of these two traits. Prote in and oil content were measured among eighteen cultivars planted in 3 0-cmx30-cm hill plots and 1.8-m row plots, and among four cultivars pl anted in separate experiments aimed at comparing the end vs. center of the row in 1.8-m row plots. Four F-5 and F-6 populations were planted in 1.8-m and 3.6-m row plots at five MN locations over 2 yr to determ ine the effect of plot size and the heritability of protein and oil co ntent. Protein and oil content were not affected by plot type, support ed by a high correlation between row and hill plots for both protein a nd oil content (r=0.82, P >0.01). Sampling position in the row had a l arge effect, with higher protein and lower oil content in seed collect ed at the end of the row. Selection for protein and oil content in sho rt, single-row plots at one location appears to be equivalent to selec tion for protein and oil content from long, multiple-row plots at mult iple locations, although year effects may have an impact. The heritabi lity estimates for protein and oil content were 0.47 to 0.54 and 0.44 to 0.46, respectively. Our results support the continuation of short, single-row evaluation tests for protein and oil content with the consi deration of using hill plots as an alternative to row plots.