Theory and research dealing with place identity and restorative enviro
nments have for the most part proceeded independently. Assuming that e
motional- and self-regulation are processes underlying the development
of place identity, and that a person's favorite place is an exemplar
of environments used in such regulation processes, the present study g
oes beyond preliminary observations about restorative aspects of favor
ite places to consider how individuals evaluate their favorite places
using terms set out in restorative environments theory. Finnish univer
sity students (n=78) evaluated the central square of their city (Tampe
re) and favorite and unpleasant places of their own designation using
the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), an instrument based on atte
ntion restoration theory. Consistent with notions of self-regulation,
PRS subscale scores for Being Away, Fascination, Coherence, and Compat
ibility were all high in the favorite place evaluations, but Coherence
and Compatibility were reliably higher than Being Away, which was in
turn reliably higher than Fascination. Also, PRS subscale scores for t
he favorite places were reliably higher than those for the central squ
are, which were in turn higher than those for the unpleasant places. F
urthermore, differences were also found in self-reported emotional sta
tes associated with each place. The discussion suggests ways to develo
p further mutually reinforcing relations between restorative environme
nts research and research on place identity.