Undergraduate subjects were asked to picture themselves as supervisors
deciding how much to pay each member of a group of five workers. Inde
pendent variables are sex composition of work group, sex of high or lo
w producer, output of deviant producer, and group task outcome. We exa
mined choice of equality versus equity, dollar amount allocated, perce
ption of relative value of workers, social orientation, and task orien
tation. Only one of the original hypotheses, the only one not related
to gender, was supported: There is an association between expressing a
social orientation and choosing to allocate equally, and between expr
essing a task orientation and choosing to allocate equitably. This fin
ding characterized male and female subjects equally. We found no suppo
rt for any hypotheses based on common assumptions about gender and all
ocation, or gender and management style. Male and female supervisors r
espond similarly to both mixed sex groups and groups of their own gend
er, but differently to supervising a group that consists entirely of w
orkers of the opposite gender to themselves. Perceived success versus
failure of the group is an important conditioning variable.