R. Lorini et al., CELIAC-DISEASE AND TYPE-I (INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETES-MELLITUS IN CHILDHOOD - FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, Journal of diabetes and its complications, 10(3), 1996, pp. 154-159
To ascertain the specificity of IgA and IgG antigliadin (IgA-AGA, IgG-
AGA), IgA-antireticulin (R1-ARA), and antiendomysial (AEA) antibodies
for the diagnosis of celiac disease, we evaluated 133 type I diabetic
children aged 1.4-28.4 years (mean 14.1 +/- 6.6), with diabetes from o
nset to 20.5 years. Fifty-three patients were considered at onset and
69 of these also during follow-up. IgA-AGA and IgG-AGA were determined
by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), R1-ARA and AEA by indir
ect immunofluorescence. IgA-AGA were positive in 20 of 133 (15%), IgG-
AGA were positive in seven of 133 (5.26%), while R1-ARA and AEA were p
ositive in three patients. At the onset of disease rye found elevated
IgA-AGA in 17 of 53 (32%) patients, IgG-AGA in four (7.55%) patients,
three of them with IgA-AGA as well; R1-ARA and AEA were present in thr
ee (5.66%) patients, all with high IgA-AGA levels. During 1-10 year fo
llow-up IgA-AGA decreased to within the normal range in 13 patients wi
th elevated IgA-AGA at onset but without RI-ARA and AEA; in four patie
nts with high IgA-AGA at onset, IgA-AGA remained constantly elevated a
s did R1-ARA and AEA in three of them; and two patients, without IgA-A
GA, R1-ARA, and AEA al onset, became positive for all three antibodies
. Intestinal biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of celiac disease in five of
these with IgA-AGA, R1-ARA, and AEA, but not in one patient with pers
istent IgA-AGA but no AEA and RI-ARA, suggesting that R1-ARA and AEA a
re more reliable markers for the screening of celiac disease in type I
diabetic patients.