AN ENERGY-BASED DESIGN CRITERION FOR MAGNETIC MICROACTUATORS

Citation
Z. Nami et al., AN ENERGY-BASED DESIGN CRITERION FOR MAGNETIC MICROACTUATORS, Journal of micromechanics and microengineering, 6(3), 1996, pp. 337-344
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic","Engineering, Mechanical
ISSN journal
09601317
Volume
6
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
337 - 344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-1317(1996)6:3<337:AEDCFM>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Magnetic actuators can be divided into two types: those in which motio n changes the gap separation (type I) and those in which motion change s the gap overlap area but not the gap separation (type II). In conven tional magnetic actuators of both types, it is assumed that most of th e magnetic energy is stored in the gap due to the large reluctance of the gap compared with the negligibly small reluctance of the magnetic core. However, in magnetic microactuators, the fabrication limitations on the achievable cross-sectional area of the magnetic core as well a s the finite core permeability increase the core reluctance to the poi nt that this assumption may no longer be valid. in this case, the magn etic energy is distributed in both the gap and the magnetic core, in w hich the energy distribution is in proportion to the reluctance of the gap (R(gap)) and the reluctance of the core (R(core)) respectively. U sing an elementary structure of a magnetic actuator, it is shown that for type 1 microactuators, when the initial gap of the actuator is fix ed (e.g., determining the stroke of the actuator), the generated magne tic force has maximum Value when the gap overlap area is designed such that the reluctance of the gap is equal to the reluctance of the magn etic core (i.e., R(gap) = R(core)). For type II actuators, the initial overlap area of the actuator is fixed (determining the stroke); there fore the generated magnetic force has a maximum value when the gap sep aration is designed such that the above equality holds. This paper det ails both analytical and finite element method (FEM) analysis confirma tion for type I actuators. Extension to type II actuators is straightf orward.