Ls. Libow et al., SEQUENTIAL OUTBREAK OF INFLUENZA-A AND INFLUENZA-B IN A NURSING-HOME - EFFICACY OF VACCINE AND AMANTADINE, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44(10), 1996, pp. 1153-1157
OBJECTIVE: To describe the sequential occurrence of influenza A and B
in a nursing home, and to determine the efficacy of influenza vaccine
and/or amantadine treatment with respect to incidence and sequelae. SE
TTING: The Jewish Home and Hospital for Aged, a skilled-care nursing f
acility. PARTICIPANTS: Of 499 frail older nursing home residents, 139
contracted influenza during the study period (mean age 87.5 years; SD
= 6.7). The residents were followed from February through April 1988.
INTERVENTION: Influenza vaccine and/or amantadine. MEASUREMENTS: Episo
des of influenza and their sequelae, i.e., pneumonia, hospitalization,
and death. RESULTS: The vaccine had no effect on the incidence of inf
luenza-like illness, length of illness, or the associated death rate.
It reduced the rate of pneumonia secondary to influenza A and B (relat
ive risk = .57; 95% CI: .37 to .89; P = .023). Amantadine did not affe
ct the attack rate of influenza nor the rate of pneumonia secondary to
influenza. It was associated with decreased mortality (relative risk
= 0; P = .001), and shorter length of influenza A illness (P-Wilcoxon
= .082). Although the combination of amantadine and vaccine did not af
fect length of influenza (A or B) illness, it was associated with a si
gnificantly lower rate of sequelae (relative risk = .58; 95% CI: .36 t
o .95; P = .024). CONCLUSION: In this epidemic, the combination of ama
ntadine and vaccine was most effective in reducing the rate of influen
za-associated sequelae. The possibility of a ''biphasic'' epidemic pro
mpts consideration of vaccinating nonimmunized nursing home residents,
even though it may be late in the influenza season.