Gd. Rubenfeld et Sw. Crawford, WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUPPORT FROM MECHANICALLY VENTILATED RECIPIENTS OF BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTS - A CASE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES, Annals of internal medicine, 125(8), 1996, pp. 625
Background: Mechanical ventilation after bone marrow transplantation i
s associated with a high mortality rate. The available literature prov
ides conflicting predictors of outcome in relatively small study group
s. Objective: To identify predictors of death and mortality trends in
mechanically ventilated transplant recipients. Design: Nested case-con
trol study. Setting: The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Sea
ttle, Washington, which specializes in bone marrow transplantation. Pa
tients: All survivors (cases, n = 53) and a group of patients matched
for year of transplantation who did not survive (controls, n = 106) we
re selected from all mechanically ventilated patients (n = 865) who re
ceived a bone marrow transplant between January 1980 and July 1992. Pa
tients who received mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours afte
r a procedure or who received mechanical ventilation after a second bo
ne marrow transplantation were excluded. Measurements: Surviving patie
nts were defined as those who were alive 30 days after extubation and
who were discharged from the hospital. Daily laboratory, physiologic,
and treatment variables were collected. Results: Survival was statisti
cally associated with younger age, lower score on the Acute Physiology
and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and a shorter time from transplant
ation to intubation. There were no survivors among an estimated 398 pa
tients who had lung injury and either required more than 4 hours of va
sopressor support or had sustained hepatic and renal failure. Through
the use of these factors, an accurate prediction of death could have b
een made in the first 4 days of mechanical ventilation for more than h
alf of the patients who did not survive. During the past 5 years, surv
ival rate has changed from 5% to 16% (P = 0.008), an increase that was
not explained by changes in the age of the patients, the rate or timi
ng of intubation, or the percentage of allogeneic transplants that wer
e not HLA-identical. Conclusion: Of the patients who required mechanic
al ventilation after bone marrow transplantation, no one survived with
lung injury combined with either hemodynamic instability or hepatic a
nd renal failure. However, survival after mechanical ventilation seems
to be improving.