C. Laine et al., IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF OUTPATIENT CARE - A COMPARISON OF PATIENTS AND PHYSICIANS OPINIONS, Annals of internal medicine, 125(8), 1996, pp. 640
Objective: To compare patients' and physicians' opinions on the import
ance of discrete elements of health care as determinants of the qualit
y of outpatient care. Design: Analysis of results of a mailed survey.
Setting: Community-based internal medicine practices. Participants: 74
general internists and 814 patients randomly selected from the practi
ces of these internists. Measures: 125 elements of care that covered n
ine domains were identified: physician clinical skill, physician inter
personal skill, support staff office environment, provision of informa
tion, patient involvement, nonfinancial access, finances, and coordina
tion of care. Participants rated each element on its importance to hig
h-quality care on a 4-point scale: 1 = not important; 2 = of medium im
portance; 3 = of high importance; and 4 = essential. Patients' and phy
sicians' ratings were compared for individual elements of care and for
elements aggregated into domains. Results: Survey response rates were
93% for physicians and 60% for patients. In an element-by-element com
parison of ratings, ratings by the two groups differed substantially f
or 58% of the attributes. The most striking difference was seen in the
domain of provision of information (median ratings, 3.56 for patients
and 2.85 for physicians; P < 0.001). Ratings by the two groups also d
iffered in the domains of clinical skill (3.75 for patients and 3.35 f
or physicians: P < 0.001), nonfinancial access (3.00 for patients and
2.87 for physicians; P < 0.001), and finances (3.00 for patients and 2
.80 for physicians; P - 0.006). When relative rankings of the domains
were compared, both groups agreed that clinical skill is most importan
t; however, patients ranked provision of information second in importa
nce whereas physicians ranked it sixth. Conclusions: Patients and phys
icians agreed that the most crucial element of outpatient care is clin
ical skill, but they disagreed about the relative importance of other
aspects of care, particularly effective communication of health-relate
d information. These differences in perception may influence the quali
ty of interactions between physicians and patients.