Ml. Ditmars et F. Bongard, LAPAROSCOPY FOR TRIAGE OF PENETRATING TRAUMA - THE DECISION TO EXPLORE, Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery, 6(5), 1996, pp. 285-291
The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating trauma continues to
evolve. We reviewed our experience to determine the effect of laparosc
opy on therapeutic laparotomy rates, length of hospital stay, and hosp
ital charges. Laparoscopy was performed on 106 hemodynamically stable
patients with penetrating abdominal injuries (66 had gunshot wounds, 4
0 had stab wounds). All patients with laparoscopically identified peri
toneal penetration underwent open laparotomy. At laparoscopy, 41 (39%)
had positive findings, whereas 65 (61%) had none. Two patients with r
etroperitoneal hematomas and one with ecchymosis of the peritoneum wer
e not explored. Thus 68 (64%) did not require laparotomy. Among the 38
who underwent laparotomy, 29 (76%) had positive findings and 9 (24%)
had a negative laparotomy. Nineteen patients (50%) had a therapeutic l
aparotomy. This compares with a therapeutic laparotomy rate of 18% had
all 106 patients undergone mandatory laparotomy. Data for length of s
tay and hospital charges were analyzed. Due to the extended stay assoc
iated with tube thoracostomy (n = 21), a subgroup excluding patients w
ith chest tubes was also analyzed. In this subgroup, there was a signi
ficant difference in hospital stay between those who had only a laparo
scopy and those who underwent a negative laparotomy (2.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 4
.7 +/- 1.6, p < 0.01). The average nonsurgical charge for patients who
had a negative laparotomy was more than double that for those who had
laparoscopy only ($8275 +/- 4692 vs. $3762 +/- 3786, p < 0.01). We co
nclude that the use of diagnostic laparoscopy to identify peritoneal p
enetration resulted in an improved therapeutic laparotomy rate as well
as significant reduction in hospital stay and hospital charges.