M. Chatenay et al., DOES VOLUME OF CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE AFFECT PERFORMANCE OF CLINICAL CLERKS ON SURGERY EXIT EXAMINATIONS, The American journal of surgery, 172(4), 1996, pp. 366-372
BACKGROUND: Controversy persists over the educational value of the vol
ume of student clerkship clinical activities. METHODS: Students (109)
from the class of 1995 recorded their clinical experiences in a logboo
k during their surgical clerkship at one of four affiliated teaching h
ospitals, The influence of clinical experience on examination scores a
nd on correlations between prerotation and postrotation examination pe
rformance was determined, RESULTS: Between sites, marked variation in
clinical experience was observed but postrotation scores were similar.
High-volume experience in emergency admissions and feedback was assoc
iated with better objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) per
formance, but high-volume outpatient clinic experience was associated
with less satisfactory OSCE performance. Correlations between prerotat
ion examination performance and the OSCE was increased by feedback on
emergency and elective admissions, in a positive and negative directio
n, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that surgical clerks' cl
inical skills were enhanced by an increased volume of some but not all
clinical experiences and that feedback does not necessarily enhance p
erformance. These data suggest that both the volume of clinical experi
ence and the quality of feedback should be carefully monitored by surg
ical clerkship directors.