F. Watzinger et al., HORSESHOE LE-FORT-I OSTEOTOMY IN COMBINATION WITH ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS - A MEDIAN-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 25(6), 1996, pp. 424-429
Fourteen patients with Class VI resorption of the maxilla were treated
with horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy. In 11 cases, the procedure was fo
llowed by the placement of endosteal implants. In six patients, simult
aneous placement of implants was carried out, while in five patients t
his was done in a second procedure. Ten patients wore their implants-s
upported dentures. In one patient, 5/8 implants were lost due to nonin
tegration. There patients lost one implant each. The total number of i
mplants placed was 76, and the survival rate of the implants was 88.1%
. In the one-step procedure (n = 42), the survival rate was 84.8%; in
the two-step procedure (n = 34), 92.3%. In comparison of the one-step
to the two-step procedure, there was no statistically significant diff
erence (P>0.11) between the amount of marginal peri-implant bone loss
and the condition of the peri-implant soft tissues as measured 2 years
after implantation.