J. Waitzinger et al., BIOEQUIVALENCE EVALUATION OF 2 PREPARATIONS CONTAINING THE HIGHLY VARIABLE COMPOUND SELEGILINE (L-DEPRENYL), International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 34(10), 1996, pp. 427-432
Selegiline, used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, inhibits the
intracerebral degradation of dopamine and the uptake of catecholamine
s. Due to a high volume of distribution and also a high rate of biotra
nsformation the concentrations of selegiline in plasma are rather low.
In addition, there are indications that selegiline binds to erythrocy
tes. An open, randomized, 2-way cross-over study was performed in 24 h
ealthy male volunteers to determine bioavailability and pharmacokineti
c parameters of 2 oral selegiline preparations after single dose admin
istration, Statistical tests were applied to the pharmacokinetic param
eters AUC(inf), AUC(0-8), AUC(z), C-max and t(max). The terminal half-
lives t(1/2) for selegiline with geometric means of 1.69 h (n = 22) an
d 1.76 h (n = 21) for treatments A and B and for N-desmethyl-selegilin
e with geometric means of 1.98 h and 1.96 h for treatments A and B agr
eed very well. AUC(inf) of selegiline could be compared between treatm
ents for 14 subjects only, The geometric mean ratio was 97.80% with a
90% confidence interval that ranged from 79.58% - 120.17% and thus exc
eeded the (80%, 125%) range by a very small margin. After correction f
or the actual dose contained in each of the 2 preparations the geometr
ic mean ratio was calculated to 98.39% with a 90% confidence interval
that ranged from 80.06% - 120.90% and thus was fully contained within
the (80%, 125%) acceptance range, Treatments also agreed very well wit
h respect to AUC(inf) of N-desmethyl-selegiline, the active metabolite
of selegiline, with a geometric mean ratio of 96.14% with a 90% confi
dence interval that ranged from 92.41% - 100.01% so that bioequivalenc
e of the 2 treatments could be shown very clearly with respect to this
metabolite. The AUC of N-desmethyl-selegiline in serum is about 6-fol
d higher than that of the parent drug. It is assessed with low variabi
lity. Thus, it is reasonable to base the judgement for or against bioe
quivalence primarily on the data obtained for the metabolite although
''a larger acceptance range may be acceptable if inevitable and clinic
ally acceptable'' for the parent compound selegiline which certainly c
an be classified as a ''highly variable compound''.