Mc. Richardson et al., INCIDENCE AND NATURE OF BILE-DUCT INJURIES FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - AN AUDIT OF 5913 CASES, British Journal of Surgery, 83(10), 1996, pp. 1356-1360
The rapid introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associ
ated with an apparently increased incidence of bile duct injury which
has provoked worldwide concern. The true incidence and mechanism of ia
trogenic ductal injury during the development of this procedure remain
unclear. To assess this, the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystec
tomy in the West of Scotland has been audited prospectively over a 5-y
ear period. All cases of biliary ductal injury have been independently
reviewed. Some 48 surgeons undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy i
n 19 hospitals submitted prospective data between September 1990 and S
eptember 1995. A total of 5913 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were 98.
3 per cent completion of data collection. During this period 37 laparo
scopic bile duct injuries occurred. The annual incidence peaked at 0.8
per cent and has fallen to 0.4 per cent in the final year of audit. I
njuries occurred after a median personal experience of 51 (range 3-247
) laparoscopic cholecystectomies in 22 surgeons. Major bile duct injur
ies occurred in 20 of 37 patients, giving an incidence of 0.3 per cent
. Five mechanisms for laparoscopic ductal injury were identified, incl
uding tenting, confluence and diathermy injuries as well as the classi
cal and variant classical types. Ductal injuries were discovered at op
eration in 18 patients with consequent repair giving a good clinical o
utcome in 17. Contributory factors (severe inflammation, aberrant anat
omy and poor visualization) were present in only 13 of 37 cases. This
audit suggests that, at least in the introductory period, laparoscopic
cholecystectomy is associated with an overall bile duct injury rate h
igher than that reported previously after open cholecystectomy, althou
gh the incidence of major ductal injury is similar. The late downward
trend in bile duct injury, however, suggests there may be a prolonged
learning curve for this procedure. Improved understanding of the mecha
nism of injury may lead to yet further reductions in this complication
.