Dn. Anderson et al., ACCURACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE STAGING OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCY, British Journal of Surgery, 83(10), 1996, pp. 1424-1428
Laparoscopic ultrasonographic staging was compared prospectively with
conventional computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonographic staging of
24 lower-third oesophageal tumours and 20 gastric malignancies. Follow
ing laparoscopic ultrasonography, seven patients regarded as being res
ectable after conventional imaging were excluded from surgical explora
tion because of ascites with peritoneal deposits (four patients), live
r metastases (one), advanced local disease (one) and poor tolerance of
general anaesthesia (one). Preoperative T and N stages were compared
with the pathological staging following resection in 34 patients. Lapa
roscopic ultrasonography was significantly more accurate than conventi
onal CT and ultrasonography in assessment of the primary tumour (91 ve
rsus 64 per cent, P <0.01) and nodal status (91 versus 62 per cent, P<
0.05). The addition of laparoscopic ultrasonography to conventional pr
ocedures for staging upper gastrointestinal malignancy improved the ov
erall accuracy of staging. Although this may have future implications
for the selection of patients for multimodality treatment, management
decisions are currently based on laparoscopic findings, which in this
study resulted in a resection rate of 97 per cent.