PARAMETERIZING AGREEMENT FEATURES IN ARABIC, BANTU LANGUAGES, AND VARIETIES OF ENGLISH

Authors
Citation
E. Vangelderen, PARAMETERIZING AGREEMENT FEATURES IN ARABIC, BANTU LANGUAGES, AND VARIETIES OF ENGLISH, Linguistics, 34(4), 1996, pp. 753-767
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics","Language & Linguistics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00243949
Volume
34
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
753 - 767
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-3949(1996)34:4<753:PAFIAB>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Subject-verb (SV) and verb-subject (VS) structures differ where agreem ent is concerned. The question to be answered is why languages display less verbal agreement in VS structures than in SV structures. Within a government-binding framework, the problem has been accounted for (e. g. by Koopman and Sportiche 1991) by arguing that there is a real Spec -Head agreement relationship in SV structures (with the subject in the specifier position and the verb in the head of a functional projectio n) but a government relationship in VS structures (with the moved verb governing the subject position). In this paper, I explain the differe nt agreement patterns in Arabic, Kirundi/Kinyarwandi, and Belfast Engl ish through a modification of the minimalist framework (cf: Chomsky 19 92). I argue that in VS structures, expletives are responsible for the agreement (and the ''breakdown'' of agreement). Expletives, which may for instance be specified for singular number, are inserted and check some of the phi features. The other features are checked after the NP moves at LF. ''Dividing up'' the agreement (or phi) features accounts for a number of ''breakdowns'' in agreement in the other two language s as well.