EXTERNAL REVIEW FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE IN SCHOOLS OF NURSING

Citation
L. Reilly et al., EXTERNAL REVIEW FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE IN SCHOOLS OF NURSING, Nurse education today, 16(5), 1996, pp. 368-372
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Nursing
Journal title
ISSN journal
02606917
Volume
16
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
368 - 372
Database
ISI
SICI code
0260-6917(1996)16:5<368:ERFPAT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
To obtain information about external review for tenure and/or promotio n, the faculty affairs committee in a large nursing program located in the southeastern United States conducted a survey among programs that award a doctoral degree in nursing, Research questions focused on gen eral tenure and promotion policies, policies and procedures regarding the we of external review, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of external review, A 22-item survey was sent to 53 institutions with a total of 34 usable surveys being returned, findings revealed that a majority of the schools used external review, especially for tenure de cisions and promotion to the associate and professor rank, Promotion a nd tenure criteria from individual schools were usually sent to review ers along with the candidates' curriculum vitae and manuscripts, Candi dates usually participated in the selection of external reviewers, but contact with reviewers was usually instituted by the administration w ithin the institution. It was also felt that the advantage of external review far outweighed any disadvantages.